Practice Areas

Education

Clerkships

Admissions to Practice

William M. Lafferty

Partner

Tel: (302) 351-9341
Fax: (302) 425-4679
wlafferty@mnat.com

Bill is a member of the Corporate and Business Litigation Group.  His practice involves corporate and commercial litigation, with an emphasis on cases involving mergers and acquisitions, proxy contests and consent solicitations, and shareholder class and derivative actions.  Bill’s litigation practice is concentrated on cases pending in the Delaware Court of Chancery and Delaware Supreme Court.  Bill also advises corporate clients and boards of directors with respect to litigation and transactional matters.

Professional and Community Activities

Noteworthy

Representative Matters

M&A Transactions/LitigationIn the past few years, Bill has been involved in a number of significant M&A transactions and related litigations, including representations of: (1) Caremark Rx, Inc. and its Board of Directors in connection with its stock-for-stock merger of equals with CVS Corporation, and related hostile exchange offer by Express Scripts, Inc. (Louisiana Municipal Police Employees’ Retirement System v. Crawford; 2007 Del. LEXIS 27 (Del. Ch. Feb. 23, 2007) (denying in part, broad preliminary injunction sought by class plaintiffs and Express Scripts against Caremark-CVS merger), appeal refused, Express Scripts, Inc. v. Crawford, 2007 Del. LEXIS 101 (Del. Mar. 8, 2007)); (2) Texas Pacific Group and Apollo Management L.P. in connection with their going-private acquisition of Harrah’s Entertainment, Inc.; (3) Cox Communications, Inc. and a special committee of its Board of Directors in connection with its going-private merger with the company’s majority stockholder, Cox Enterprises, Inc. (In re Cox Commc’ns S’holders Litig., 879 A.2d 604 (Del. Ch. 2005)); (4) Fox Entertainment Group and a special committee of its Board of Directors in connection with its going-private merger with the company’s majority stockholder, News Corporation; (5) Solar Capital Corporation (an acquisition vehicle formed by a number of private equity investors) in connection with its all cash acquisition of SunGard Data Systems, Inc. (In re SunGard Data Systems, Inc. S’holder Litig., 2005 Del. Ch. LEXIS 105 (Del. Ch. July 6, 2005)); and (6) Cardiac Science, Inc. in connection with its stock-for-stock merger with Quinton Cardiology Systems, Inc.

Advancement/Indemnification MattersSuccessfully represented former officer of Oplink Communications, Inc. in connection with her demand for advancement of legal fees and expenses under 8 Del. C. § 145(e) and an advancement agreement between the former officer, Oplink and Oplink’s D&O Insurer. In addition, successfully represented a former officer of Homestore, Inc. in connection with his demand for advancement of legal fees and expenses incurred in connection with numerous proceedings in which the former officer was named as a defendant. The case was tried before the Court of Chancery in 2004 and all of the Court of Chancery opinions in the case were affirmed on appeal by the Delaware Supreme Court. See Tafeen v. Homestore, Inc., 888 A.2d 204 (Del. 2005) and numerous other opinions issued in this case.

Internal Corporate Investigations:  Recent experience with internal corporate investigations in connection with stockholder derivative claims and other claims related to alleged corporate wrongdoing, including representations of Special Litigation Committees of the Boards of Directors of NuSkin Enterprises, Inc. (Kindt v. Lund, 2003 Del. Ch. LEXIS 62 (Del. Ch. May 30, 2003) (granting corporation’s motion to dismiss based on report and recommendation of SLC)), Community Bancshares, Inc., and Hanover Compressor Company.

Hostile Takeovers and Proxy/Consent ContestsSignificant experience in both the offensive and defensive sides of hostile M&A transactions, including recent representations of (1) Delcath Systems, Inc. in connection with its defense of a hostile consent solicitation (Delcath Sytems, Inc. v. Ladd, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67720 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 20, 2006), rev’d, 466 F.3d 257 (2d Cir. 2006)); (2) Parlux Fragrances, Inc. in connection with its defense of a hostile consent solicitation; (3) Maxwell Shoe Company in connection with its defense against a hostile offer from Jones Apparel (Jones Apparel Group, Inc. v. Maxwell Shoe Co., Inc., 883 A.2d 837 (Del. Ch. 2004)); and (4) Mesa Air Group in connection with its hostile attempt to acquire Atlantic Coast Airlines (Mesa Air Group, Inc. v. Atlantic Coast Airlines Holdings, Inc., C.A. No. 027-N, Chandler, C.)).

Class and Derivative ActionsSignificant experience in stockholder class and derivative actions, including recent representations of the Boards of Directors of ConAgra Foods, Inc. (see In Re ConAgra Foods Derivative Litig., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70787 (D. Neb. Sept. 27, 2006) (dismissing stockholder derivative claims under Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Delaware law)); Regal Entertainment Group (see Regal Entertainment Group v. Amaranth LLC, 894 A.2d 1104 (Del. Ch. 2006) (opinion certifying defendant class action in connection with dispute over meaning of bond indenture); Aspen Advisors LLC v. United Artists Theatre Co., 843 A.2d 697 (Del. Ch. 2004), aff’d, 861 A.2d 1251 (Del. 2004) (affirming dismissal of warrant holder class action); and Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana v. Anschutz, C.A. No. 444-N, Chandler, C. (Del. Ch. June 1, 2004) (Oral Ruling denying motion to preliminarily enjoin $700 million special dividend)), Amax Gold (Lewis v. Ward, 852 A.2d 896 (Del. 2004) (affirming dismissal of derivative action)); Pogo.com (Goldman v. Pogo.com, Inc., 2002 Del. Ch. LEXIS 88 (Del. Ch. June 14, 2002) (granting motion to dismiss certain class/derivative claims in part)), and Progress Financial (Litt v. Wycoff, 2003 Del. Ch. LEXIS 23 (Del. Ch. Mar. 28, 2003) (dismissing derivative claims for failure of stockholder to make a demand)), just to name a few.

Books & Records/Stocklist Matters:  Significant experience in both the prosecution and defense of actions seeking to compel the inspection of books and records of Delaware corporations, limited partnerships, and limited liability companies.

Court Assignments:  Appointed by Court of Chancery (Chancellor William B. Chandler III) as Special Master in DiLoretto v. Tiber Holding Corp., 2001 LEXIS 26 (Del. Ch. Feb. 20, 2001), aff’d, 804 A.2d 1055 (Del. 2001)).

Pro Bono:  Recently represented two young brothers, pro bono, as Attorney Guardian Ad Litem in connection with a Delaware Family Court proceeding seeking to terminate parental rights, and related adoption proceedings.

Events

News

Notable Publications and Presentations


T: (302) 658-9200    1201 North Market Street, 16th Floor, P.O. Box 1347, Wilmington, DE 19899-1347